Question: Why Was The German Tiger Tank So Good?

Was Tiger tank really good?

As with any sophisticated weapon, the Tiger II did suffer from reliability issues, especially at the hands of the poorly trained and inexperienced tank drivers of the late war German army.

But given a skilled crew and proper logistics support, the Tiger II was fairly reliable, according to Jentz..

What was the best tank in World War II?

Ranking The 10 Best Tanks Of WWII8 Stug III.7 T-34/85.6 M4A3 Sherman “Easy 8″5 Panzer V Panther.4 Comet Cruiser Tank.3 Tiger I.2 IS-2 Heavy Tank.1 Tiger II/King Tiger.More items…•Dec 29, 2020

How many Shermans does it take to destroy a tiger?

Post war Operational Research carried out by British scientists showed that, based on combat reports from Normandy in June-August 1944 that 1.45 Shermans were equal to 1 Tiger.

Was the Tiger tank the best in ww2?

First fielded in 1942, the Tiger was meant to forge breakthroughs on the battlefield, destroying enemy tanks at long range while shrugging off hits from lesser Allied anti-tank guns. The Tiger is one of the most revered tanks of the war, if not in the entirety of tank history.

Could a Tiger tank beat a modern tank?

Even with a far superior crew, a perfect situation, and an ambush, a Tiger II would have to hit a very small small target at very close range with the best angles to kill a modern MBT.

What was the worst tank in ww2?

Maus – Hitler’s giant tank It was first proposed in 1942, but few in the German High Command saw the need for this 200 ton monster. Trials began in 1943, but there were constant mechanical problems associated with the drivetrain.

Can a Tiger tank destroy an Abrams?

Yes, a Tiger can destroy an Abrams.

Could a Sherman destroy Tigers?

So all the Sherman guns of ww2 except the 105mm howitzer can destroy a Tiger I from the rear, with the howitzer needing a specific type of ammunition to get the job done. It is worth noting that the Tiger I’s side and rear armour were the same – if you can destroy it from behind you can also destroy it from the side.

What tank has the thickest armor?

British Challenger IIBut the title for tank with thickest effective armor (in service) goes to the British Challenger II.

Are there any Tiger 2 tanks left?

This Tiger II (production turret) was previously displayed in the Thun Tank Museum, and is now on loan to the Schweizerisches Militärmuseum Full (September 2006). It will be completely restored to running condition in a long-term project. This tank was given to Switzerland by France after the war.

How many Tiger 1 tanks are left?

seven Tiger I tanksToday, only seven Tiger I tanks survive in museums and private collections worldwide. As of 2020, Tiger 131 (captured during the North Africa Campaign) at the UK’s Tank Museum is the only example restored to running order.

What killed the most tanks in World War 2?

Originally Answered: What is the most lethal tank of World war II? In terms of killing power it would be the German Tiger Tank or the later King Tiger. Both had some reliability issues and the King was underpowered but equipped with the deadly 88mm (3 1/2″) gun.

Why was the Tiger tank so feared?

The Tiger tank was greatly feared by the Allies in the Second World War – and with good reason. … Such was the strength of its armour that startled British crews would see shells fired from their Churchill tanks simply bounce off the Tiger.

Could a bazooka destroy a Tiger tank?

Those with tanks and halftracks like to think they are immune to the threat the bazookas pose on our made-up battlefields. However, the facts don’t lie. While Tigers might have been a rolling pillbox, it did have its weak points. … Below are a number of instances where bazookas were used to effectively destroy Tigers.

Was the Panther tank better than the Tiger?

The Panther was a compromise. While having essentially the same Maybach V12 petrol (690 hp) engine as the Tiger I, it had more effective frontal hull armour, better gun penetration, was lighter and faster, and could traverse rough terrain better than the Tiger I.